Middle School Debate Topics

Middle School Debate Topics Debates are a wonderful, high-interest way to teach a number of skills to students. They provide students with the ability to research a topic, work as a team, practice public speaking, and use critical thinking skills. Despiteor perhaps because ofthe challenges that go along with teaching tweens, holding debates in middle school classes can be especially rewarding. Middle School Debate Topics The following is a list of topics that would be appropriate for use in middle school classrooms. As you read through these you will see that some are more appropriate for specific curriculum areas while others can be used in classes across the board. Each item is listed as a proposition. You will assign one team this proposition and the opposing team would argue the opposite. All students should have daily chores.Every home should have a pet.Every student should play a musical instrument.Homework should be banned.School uniforms should be required.Year-round education is better for students.Children should not be allowed to drink soda.PE should be required of all students throughout middle and high school.All students should be required to volunteer in the community.Corporal punishment should be allowed in schools.The Internet should be banned from schools.Junk food should be banned from schools.All parents should be required to attend parenting classes before having a child.All students should be required to learn a foreign language in middle school.All museums should be free to the public.Single-sex schools are better for education.Students should be held legally responsible for bullying in schools.Children under 14 should not be allowed on Facebook.Prayer of any form should be prohibited in schools.Statewide tests should be abolished.All people should be vegetarians. Solar energy should replace all traditional forms of energy.Zoos should be abolished.It is sometimes right for the government to restrict freedom of speech.Human cloning should be banned.Science fiction is the best form of fiction. (Or any form of fiction of your choosing)Macs are better than PCsAndroids are better than iPhonesThe moon should be colonized.Mixed Martial Arts (MMA) should be banned.All students should be required to take a cooking class.All students should be required to take a shop or practical arts class.All students should be required to take a performing arts class.All students should be required to learn sewing.Democracy is the best form of government.America should have a king and not a president.All citizens should be required to vote.The death penalty is an appropriate penalty for certain crimes.Sports stars are paid too much money.The right to bear arms is a necessary constitutional amendment.Students should never be forced to repeat a year at school.Grades sh ould be abolished. All individuals should pay the same tax rate.Teachers should be replaced by computers.Students should be allowed to skip grades in school.The voting age should be lowered.Individuals who share music online should be put in jail.Video games are too violent.Students should be required to learn about poetry.History is an important subject in school.Students should not be required to show their work in math.Students should not be graded on their handwriting.America should give more money to other countries.Every home should have a robot.The government should provide wireless service for everyone.School pictures should be abolished.Smoking should be banned.Recycling should be required.Children should not watch television on school nights.Performance enhancing drugs should be allowed in sports.Parents should be allowed to choose their babys gender.Education is the key to future success.

Michael Crichtons Andromedia Strain Report

Michael Crichtons Andromedia Strain Report This book is about biophysicists that are conducting a special experiment. They are sending a probe into outer space and collecting organisms for study. After project "scoop" sends seventeen stalites into outer space,a probe falls and lands in the north eastern Arizona. Not very far away the scientists discover many dead bodies that look to have been flung across the ground. The bodies faces appear to have been frozen in surprise. This is just the beginning. In this book the scientists are trying to discover a cure for the deadly bacteria that kills everyone in a non violent way.. This virus kills everyone,except a newborn baby and a old man in the small town in a matter of seconds.2 scientists go into the town to look around and find the man and the baby. They are wearing protective suits so that they wont catch the virus. After getting the baby and bringing it back to a special lab,they have to find out more about the virus.None - This image is in the public domain and thus...They conduct some tests and figure out that the virus is. When they are conducting some tests they are looking under a microscope and they see a green substance that appears to be growing on a small piece of rock. They do some more experiments by putting this green substance in a cage that has a rat or a monkey,and find out that they die in a matter of seconds. After they find out what the organism looks like,they have to find a cure. They search for a long time,but no one can find a cure. Finally there is a part where the virus breaks out and a man is stuck in the lab with the virus. When a scientists looks in the videocamera,he sees the mans face and says that it looks frozen...

THE LEGAL ISSUE IN NETWORK SECURITY USA Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

THE LEGAL ISSUE IN NETWORK SECURITY USA - Essay Example Network security looks after the Local Area Network (LAN) from the external world. For the computer based crimes, it is hard to enforce any law on legal basis as the computer or the network cannot be restricted by boundaries of a country around it. There are many issues that US legal system face when dealing with the computer based crimes as they are bound in one or the other ways. This has made the criminals get a chance to misuse the available resource and be safe from legal issues. Following are some of the federal computer crime laws and status aid the US department: FERPA, TEACH and GLBA Act: ECPA and CFAA Act and Economic Espionage Act (EEA). Though there are many laws, it is important for a common man to know them so that they can use the right one at a given time. The legal system is found to be a part of the society and it cannot do anything in case the owner of a site won’t take the advantage of it. Hence, the major incidents related to network security, the progress ion of laws for safeguarding network security and the future of network security from a legal standpoint is detailed in the paper. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction 4 2. Computer and Networks 5 3. Legal issues in Network Security 6 4. Preliminary Boards and Projects for Network Security 7 5. Idea of Separate Jurisdiction 8 6. Law for e-Commerce to Avoid Identification Theft 9 7. The Cyber Crime Agreement 9 8. Approval for Electronic Signature 10 9. Laws for Federal Computer Crimes 10 9.1 The FERPA, TEACH and GLBA Act: 11 9.2 The ECPA and CFAA Act: 11 9.3 Other Laws Used to act against Computer Crimes: 12 10. Controversy 12 11. Goal of Network Security 15 12. Conclusion 15 13. References 19 1. Introduction Today’s world rises with the use of the computer for almost everything. With the introduction of internet, the world is able to keep in touch with one another. Either a common man or a company can do this without moving even an inch but share all the information with the hel p of the strong network. When the network gains importance, the issue with it will also be very important. Having a personal computer is not the only need but one should know how to protect the information that they have in it. Network security can include elements such as intrusion detection systems traffic shaping and firewalls (The Gordon Schools, 2011).

Holy Spirit in the New Testament Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

Holy Spirit in the New Testament - Essay Example Since He knows each person perfectly and it is understood that people think differently, He can transfer information to people in ways that they would comprehend it (Acts of the Apostles 2:7)." In this case, the Holy Spirit plays a significant role in transformation and teaching believers on what to do as Christian as well as fellowship among Christians through His presence. Also, the Holy Spirit is included when baptizing believers as Matthew 28:19-20 states that "19Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in[a] the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, 20and teaching them to obey everything I have commanded you. And surely I am with you always, to the very end of the age." If we are to deal with the origin of Christ when He entered here on erath in Human form, He was conceived by the Holy Spirit. Matthew 1:20-21 says "But after he had considered this, an angel of the Lord appeared to him in a dream and said, "Joseph son of David, do not be afraid to take Mary home as your wife, because what is conceived in her is from the Holy Spirit. 21She will give birth to a son, and you are to give him the name Jesus,[c] because he will save his people from their sins." Also, when Jesus was Baptized, the spirit of God appeared. In Matthew 3:16-17 it was stated that "16As soon as Jesus was baptized, he went up out of the water. At that moment heaven was opened, and he saw the Spirit of God descending like a dove and lighting on him. 17And a voice from heaven said, "This is my Son, whom I love; with him I am well pleased" The communication of Jesus with his Father is the Holy Spirit. A passage in Luke 10:21 says "21At that time Jesus, full of joy through the Holy Spirit, said, "I praise you, Father, Lord of heaven and earth, because you have hidden these things from the wise and learned, and revealed them to little children. Yes, Father, for this was your good pleasure." How can we today understand this gift of Jesus: The Holy Spirit Jesus during His time here on earth uttered that if He will not leave then the Holy Spirit not come furthermore, In John 14:26 it is stated that "26But the Counselor, the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in my name, will teach you all things and will remind you of everything I have said to you. 27Peace I leave with you; my peace I give you. I do not give to you as the world gives. Do not let your hearts be troubled and do not be afraid." T The goal of life is to know fully who I am In 2 Timothy 1:9, in Paul's letter to Timothy, it was stated that "9who has saved us and called us to a holy life-not because of anything we have done but because of his own purpose and grace. This grace was given us in Christ Jesus before the beginning of time," We are created for God's purpose. How can we recover the lost contemplative dimension of life We lost our lives due to sin and in this case, we lost everything in life including our souls. However, when Christ died for us, he freely gave us everything including our access with God. It would be once again possible if we accept the Lord Jesus as our personal Lord and Savior ( and admit that we are sinners (Repentance) the common passage for this is found on John 3:16. Also, 1

Determinism and Compatibilism Essay Example for Free

Determinism and Compatibilism Essay It is said that one of the process of approaching the arguably tough question of determining, What is human nature? is by addressing first the simples issue of what is human choice and human freedom. This has been the central issue both for western and eastern philosophers. The traditional discussion has been whether nature, that of genetics, or nurture, that of environment, is the more primary foundation of human nature. In the end, it seems that both agree that human beings are a creation of combination of nature and nurture. A lot of of individuals are fascinated in psychology, in as much as it aids one to comprehend human behavior, delving deeper in the fundamental way of understanding this occurrence. Before going to the main topic of determining whether or not hard determinism is preferred over compatabilism, it is important to know what hard determinism is and compatibilism is. According to La Fave , the basic argument of Hard Determinism is that no action is free. This means that each event is caused in accord with causal laws that explains absolutely for the happening. Clearly, nothing is uncaused. Put into simple words, HARD DETERMINISM is premised on such a way that since determinism is true, nobody is free; nobody has neither free will nor choice, no one really acts freely. Therefore, for an act to be free it should be the outcome of a choice, desire or course of action that has no cause. That is to say, free will implies that the will or selection mechanism sets off the deed. Accordingly, for the hard determinist, individuals are not distinct from any other things. Each action is a part of an event which links it to another chain of event. Hence, though it may seem that that there is a control on the current event and rational situation, one does not actually have control. Importantly, it bears stressing that if one does not have control, he can not be made morally accountable for his action. Therefore, hard determinism, if correct, is vital in testing the very core of normative ethics that as a rule presupposes that individuals may be held answerable for their acts. On the other hand Compatibilism advances the theory that free will and determinism can go together hand in hand. Thus, all human acts are causally established, but several acts are instigated in a way that is in tune with free will whereas other acts are not. DETERMINISM is attuned with autonomy and responsibility. That is, as we ourselves are the trigger of our acts, our acts are free. An act can either be caused and uncompelled. With no controversy, it can be simply stated that, an action is free if it is voluntary, that is unforced or uncompelled, on the other hand, and an action is not free if it is involuntary, that is forced or compelled. Furthermore, under compatability, the kind of freedom which is essential for moral responsibility is the origin of action that is freedom from choosing acts and choices determined by outside conditions or events. It bears stressing that this formation of freedom is attuned with determinism. Thus, this is the theory which is necessary for moral responsibility. ISSUE: Whether or not hard determinism is preferred over Compatibilism? Based on the afore cited statements, it can be inferred that hard determinism does not categorize the cause, it simply labels that all actions are produced by cause, and that everything happens for a reason, thus there exist no free will. As for compatibilism, it is simple, an action may be forced or compelled, voluntary or involuntary. If one is to choose which is preferred over hard determinism and compatibilism, it can be said that compatibilism is much logical way of thinking. It is because the hard determinist erroneously likens the term â€Å"caused† with â€Å"forced† or â€Å"compelled†. Surely each deed is instigated one way or another; however not all act is compelled. On a much simpler approach, an act can be either caused or uncompelled. It is stated at the outset that hard determinist interprets that â€Å"No act is free if it must occur† by assuming that all actions ought to transpire in a way that all are caused, and consequently not free. Summing it up, having a reason is adequate to make an action unfree. This line of thinking is brought about by the supposition that all causes are compelling, which having a cause is precisely the similar as being forced. Meanwhile, compatibility advances the idea that unfree action is an act that is forced, compelled, or involuntary. This is ordinary people’s idea of unfree. It continued to say that not all acts are voluntary; therefore, there are also acts which are free, since free in this concept means voluntary. To see the difference, take for an instance a boy who walks because he was being pushed. In this case, the hard determinism and compatibilism both agree that the boy walks because he was pushed. But, going further, as for hard determinism, the same was still categorized as acts of free will. However for compatibilism, the act was not free because the boy was pushed, it is an involuntary act. If, the boy however walks without being pushed, still the act under the concept of hard determinism is an unfree act, while for compatibility the said act is considered as free act, falling under the category of voluntary actions. Another area where compatibilism is preferred is the theory that moral accountability of individual is attached to the one who performs a wrong act. Normally, under the existing legal systems, man are accountable for their acts if they willfully and intentionally performs a wrongfully act. However, in cases where an individual performs an act against his free will which results in commission of a felony, the said person shall be exempted from penalty. In relation to the issue, it is therefore a rational to prefer compatibilism over hard determinism. In as much as hard determinism advocates the theory of no man acts freely, this would result to chaos in the enforcement of laws. On the other hand, compatibilism is much acceptable and helpful in the existing legal system as it advocates that acts are performed voluntarily or involuntarily, thereby making the determination of accountability is much easier. Thus, enforcement of law may be implemented effectively. Lastly, it is important to note that under compatibilism, actions are also brought about, but nevertheless are free in the way that, if event had been unusual, acts may be different. This means that act may vary depending on the influences, such as environment, desires or influences, which may be brought about surrounding the act. It maybe recalled that compatibilist free denote the influence or capability to perform what one desires. Those acts that are free are not enforced, not compelled, not constrained, or not enforced. Thus, while all acts that are compelled are caused, it is not the instance that every caused act is forced. In conclusion, though it can be said that choosing compatibilism over hard determinism may be justified, still many say that hard determinism is under compatibilism or either way. Others have also the view that hard determinism is better than compatibilism. Still, only one thing is proven, that man remains a complex thing to study and understand. Reference: Sandra LaFave, Free Will and Determinism. West Valley College. ( Last updated on 08/11/2006 08:18:00) http://instruct. westvalley. edu/lafave/FREE. HTM Martha Klein, â€Å"Responsibility,† in The Oxford Companion to Philosophy, ed. Ted Honderich (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995) John Stuart Mill, On Liberty, ed. Elizabeth Rapaport (Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company, Inc. , 1978).

For Every Action There is a Reaction in Macbeth Essay -- Macbeth Essay

William Shakespeare’s play Macbeth tells the story of Macbeth, a loyal and brave nobleman who lives in Scotland, with his wife Lady Macbeth. At the start of the play, Macbeth (a general in the army of King Duncan, originally thane of Glamis, then thane of Cawdor, and later King of Scotland) takes three prophecies from three atrocious witches. The first witch says, â€Å"All hail, Macbeth! hail to thee, thane of Glamis† (1.3.48). The second witch says, â€Å"All hail, Macbeth! hail to thee, thane of Cawdor† (1.3.49). The third witch tells us the final prophecy and she says, â€Å"All hail, Macbeth! that shall be king hereafter† (1.3.50). This is where the whole play unfolds with Macbeth knowing that he will become King in times way, and so forth he begins his way to becoming king with later on in the play as he murderers the King of Scotland, King Duncan. He eventually kills many others such as Banquo, Lady Macduff and her children, which later on in the play everyone caught on to why Macbeth killed the innocent, and is to why everyone retired away from his power, went against him and killed him. Macbeth’s death would be considered a â€Å"Poetic Justice† in the play Macbeth. The outburst of Lady Macbeth’s death for taking out a suicide would as well be considered a â€Å"Poetic Justice† in the play. But the wicked from them all, the three witches do not suffer in any way and do not take any punishment for their acts. The degree of â€Å"Poetic Justice† found in the play of Macbeth is acceptable and would be at a completion of 85%. The first to be mentioned in my introduction paragraph right above is the one and only Macbeth. The first malevolent decision by Lady Macbeth and Macbeth was to kill King Duncan. With King Duncan ... ...ld be when Macduff slaughters Macbeth and Malcolm is put back in the honour of the throne and is called King of Scotland. So, therefore, the witches are just as guilty for the events that place, but yet they suffer no punishment for it. The only people in the whole play that have done wrong have been either murdered or have committed suicide but the witches. I left my degree at an 85% for the reason that the witches were not punished in the act of justice but just left alone. Reason being is because no one but Banquo and Macbeth knew of them which are how they played the whole game invisible to their own power. Whether or not that poetic justice is served to all, it did serve to the biggest treats in the whole play; Macbeth and Lady Macbeth. Works Cited "Justice in Macbeth." 123HelpMe.com. 13 Jan 2016 .

Morality In “Queen Vs. Dudley And Stephens” Essay

1. In the case of Queen vs. Dudley and Stephens, was the killing of the cabin boy, Richard Parker, morally wrong? Relate your answer to one or more of the following ethical theories: Aristotelian ethics, Hobbesian ethics, Utilitarianism, or Kantian ethics. Be sure to give a summary of the main points of the theory, as well as drawing out its implications for the case. In the case of Dudley and Stephens, the murder of Richard Parker cannot be justified as being morally permissible. Our society functions on certain base principles, one of them being that there are some things which are forbidden, that particular actions or measures can never be correct due to their nature. Murder is an action which qualifies as being fundamentally wrong, it can never be said that murder is the right thing to do, because no matter the context, murder is in no way a morally permissible course of action. While it is true that all of the crew members would most certainly have died if Parker had not been slain, that is still not enough reason to have permitted the murder. Even if the boy had been consulted on the matter and he had subsequently granted his consent, the act of murder still cannot be justified. There is no situation so dire (excluding warfare and self-defense) to warrant the voluntary taking of another human being’s life. Although the crew had already gone numerous days without any form of nourishment, murder was still not the proper course of action. The boy was near death, and perhaps if they had waited just another day he would have died naturally, and then they could have used his body. This standpoint of murder never being the right decision is supported by Aristotle’s theory of â€Å"virtue ethics†. His theory states that we should live our lives according to principles of virtue and morality, and this will lead to an attainment of happiness. Aristotle says that not all of our actions should be virtuous, as an extreme amount of anything won’t bring happiness, but rather we should live to a mean between evil and morality. He believes that through our ability to reason and choose our actions we will reach that mean position and balance our lives to a point of happiness. While the theory does allow us to choose some actions which are not moral